SDI #469 - 20 Questions

SDI #469


20 Questions inspired at long, long last:

1. What is the real legacy of Richard Hall?

2. What was, and is, Richard Hall's reward?

3. What is owed Richard Hall?

4. Where is Richard Hall Found?

5. Did Richard Hall know science and internalize its philosophy?

6. Did Richard Hall put his faith in the system even as it abused him?

7. Is the contribution of Richard Hall as yet fully realized?

8. A question not asked, though begged, is who needs to grovel at the feet of the memory of Richard Hall in the first place and wash their feet before standing on the shoulders of same, in the second?

9. Why can Richard Hall, like James McDonald, be forgiven, even congratulated, for the only flaw either of them had in equal measure?

10. Are UFO organizations set against one another, past, present, and future, by the admitted non-admitted unilateral, even fascist, government?

11. Are UFOs ignored because they are too "hard" to countenance? How hard is it, and what groups find it hardest?

12. What did Richard Hall find objectionable in Ufology?

13. Has David Cherniack produced a 3 DVD box set of his, UFOs - The Secret History, and does it contain a collection of credible Ufologists seldomheard from but as significant as any?

14. What is the impact of UFOs - The Secret History?

15. Is the economy good or bad for UFOs?

16. How close to "the truth" is UFOs - The Secret History?

17. Has UFOs - The Secret History, gotten any untoward attention from irksome klasskurtxians? If not why not?

18. Is the late abductioneer John Mack heavily featured in the bonus discs for UFOs - The Secret History, among significant others?

19. Is the extraterrestrial hypothesis examined in a scholarly manner within the bonus discs?

20. Is, apart from the documentary proper, rabid speculation rationally regarded in the bonus discs?


Zounds and Mirgatroid listener, but over an hour of graspable outré remains?

Cherniack continues and Lonnie Zamora and Mac Tonnies are remembered. In one of the several clips provided... Errol's Bobbi makes her report regarding oddnesses from back in the day vicinity "Go Home Lake," in Canada... Grant Cameron reveals one Turner Holt, President Roosevelt and hisSecretary of State Cordell Hall -and Holt's cousin- involving proclaimed aliens in big glass jugs and a crashed saucer in the Capital Building of the time, 1935.

"Somebody should know about this stuff," Holt's lucid, moral,and now elderly daughters report... ...plus Lehmberg walks you to your carriage outside ranting the usual jeremiad of buxom seditions and unsubtle heresies...

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

Know your toad responsibly.



alienview@roadrunner.com
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

SDI #468 Twenty Questions

SDI #468

20 Questions astonishingly if insightfully addressed by Dave Furlotte, Roger Marsh, Glen Campbell, Frank Feschino, and Alfred Lehmberg as seamlessly produced and then deftly executed by Bosscat Bruce-Knapp, esq.:

1. Are ufologists intellectually challenged, fundamentally bonkers, insane, foop-shooby, or flip city?

2. Have our "intrepid mainstream authorities" put last years flap at O'hare entirely to rest as the most prosaic of prosaic prosaics (sic)?

3. Who, indeed, is guilty of Streckers' "pathological receptiveness" and can these be revalidated with lithium and a big bag of stale Easter peeps?

4. Does Dr. Harlow Shapely, a one time eminent Harvard astronomer, stick a fork in UFOs with his admonition that anyone seeing such —Jimmy Carter springs to mind— is either drunk or crazy?

5. Do "uncommon objects" seen in "uncommon seeing conditions" constitute all uncommon reports and observations... apart, of course, from those made by "the crazy liars," as proclaimed by the infamous uber-klasskurtxian Dr. Donald Menzel?

6. Did Donald Menzel, himself, see a UFO then dismiss same as, likely, some poorly digested beef?

7. Do all card carrying klasskurtxians cop the M-cubed plea reflexively? UFOs are a result of the Misled, the Mis-leading, and the Mentally ill... exclusively?

8. Is smirking klasskurtxian "spokespuppy" Mr. Oberg a paid disinformation agent —whatever that may mean— and ashamed of his apostrophe?

9. Do civil aircraft pilots regularly "over-interpret their observations" from the cockpit, according to Mr. Oberg, and what does this mean regarding the safely of the passengers flying?

10. Are airline pilots subject to fits of temerarious insanity while they fly!?

11. Who said, "...All UFOs are easily explainable because they can all be rationally explained..."?

12. Can one prove an ordinary absolute?

13. Is Dave Furlotte Crazy? Errol Bruce-Knapp? Is this writer only assisting the misleading, presumed to be misled, or dismissed as mentally ill?

14. Was the aforementioned Dr. Menzel, who saw his UFO, crazy?

15. Does Mr. Oberg "slide the scale" or otherwise play fast and loose with his goalposts when his spurious argument begins its obligatory tatter? Can the reader say, "Jerry Cohen"?

16. Are all UFO reports bona fide observations of the craft flown by intelligent reptiles from a moon vicinity Betelgeuse?

17. Is it entirely impossible any longer to believe ones own eyes?

18. Does technology bring us closer to the UFO or does it keep us away?

19. Is psychiatry always able to recognize "crazy"?

20. "...Yet here [Screamin' Demon]! The wind sets in the shoulder of your sail, and you are stayed for"?


A suffering Zot —most barragrugous— good readers and listeners, but that 58 explosive minutes of SDI remain! Again, I am unable to clear even the always provocative Dave Furlotte regarding 20 questions prodded and gouged from sensibilities outraged anew!

Be that as it may newcomer Roger Marsh, the director of communications for MUFON, outlines a new ufological consciousness venue for MUFON uber-grande artists, writers, and contributors at examiner.com.

Area 51 Legend Glen Campbell visits inspiration even as he travels what he indicates is "irrelevant" and "disappointing" ground. Damn.

Frank Feschino at last puts paid to previous if errant and otherwise erroneous estimations of well earned credibility. He, at once, at great cost, and from over four arduous years unceasing litigation, resurrects face, justice, and victory for himself, Stanton Friedman, and an aviation war history in plain sight all the time... but missed by everyone else! Crow hors d'oeuvres will be served with brandy and cigars on the poop deck.

Alfred Lehmberg rounds out with some gobsmackers! Did Glen Campbell invent the ufological internet?

It was a time of known toads, "known" to be knowing not — knowing _still_, brothers and sisters! Know that toad!

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

alienview@roadrunner.com
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

New Interview With Glenn Campbell

Area 51 Loose Ends: New Interview With Glenn Campbell

SDI #467 Twenty Questions

SDI #467

20 Questions stalwartly "Canad-iated" by Dave Furlotte, Chris Styles, and Chris Rutkoski as compellingly introduced, expertly orchestrated, and otherwise addressed by Maestro Canad-ioso Errol Bruce-Knapp:

1. Are there more cops chasing UFOs and should the occupants of same speak to the police if pulled over?

2. Why is a policeman the better witness to a UFO?

3. What are the Ufological consequences of more people with cell phone cameras?

4. Does official authority regularly change stories about UFOs to fit emergent facts?

5. Are there more UFOs presently... or more cell phones capturing what's always been there?

6. Is the mainstream reporting more UFOs... because lay persons are reporting more UFOs via cell pone, YouTube, and Twitter?

7. Are military aircraft still attacking UFOs the way UFOs were attacked in the 1950s as a result of shoot down orders then in effect as per Feschino in Shoot Them Down ?

8. Are more reports of UFOs coming from commercial pilots than ever before?

9. Is it really "only matter of time" before there is a huge public outcry from the citizenry regarding just what in hell is flying so strangely in our skies, pray tell, as pursued by the police and military aircraft all the way from simple observation helicopters to armed F-16s?

10. If UFOs do not exist, or are in fact merely an inert "unidentified aerial phenomena" without import or any special interest -by official report beneath significance- what is being pursued and _unsuccessfully_ interdicted by police and military aircraft... as diverse as light observation helicopters and armed F-16s?

11. Are UFOs a threat to public safety?

12. How is getting Al Capone on his income taxes like disclosing UFOs because they are a threat to civil airplanes?

13. Is the flow of information with regard to UFOs largely un-controlled?

14. Is it true that the government and the military have no real control over information transmission?

15. When is a UFO, a UAP - a UFO?

16. What's the "dirty water," really, for?

17. Is Shag Harbor, and other documented maritime close encounters of the "woo-woo" kind, evidence of a hazard to maritime public safety?

18. How does a demonstrated encounter like Shag Harbor slip through the cracks of a conscientious history?

19. Was there a Canadian Law Enforcement presence witnessing the Shag Harbor event?

20. What was the sparkling yellow foam afloat on the water of same?

Verily, with 70 plus minutes _remaining_ at this point, the "barragrugous Zot" continues unabated and with no small vigor, reader! Styles rocks on unimpeded by the smallest hesitation to outline only the facts of the _highest_ strangeness! Then Rutkowski rolls out legitimate all timers, eclipsing all gone before! Not for the institutionally faint of heart unless you're interested in finally bringing those barriers down and discounting a little ego. Though, any of us can use a little of that if current events show that to be true, at all.

The Toad is known by more and more! Know the toad!

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

alienview@roadrunner.com

http://www.alienview.net/

AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

U F O M a g a z i n e -- http://www.ufomag.com/

SDI #465 Twenty Questions

20 Questions _especially_ well addressed by Dave Furlotte, Stuart Miller, Chris Rutkowski... as chopped and channeled by the paranormal stylings of Errol Bruce-Knapp in a manner as reasoned as it is reasonable and as reasoning as it is... raison d'être...

.
1. How does one "prove" the existence of something where no proof is accepted?

.

2. How much has humanity grown with its technology, and how much has it _matured_?

.

3. Why have our plethora of media recording devises not settled the UFO issue?

.

4. Can our technology be depended upon to faithfully determine fact from fiction? Does that determination change the thing determined in the same fashion an electron is changed as a result of mere observation re the state of same?

.

5. How much of George Orwell's _1984_ has actually been realized?

.

6. How can the existence of UFOs be validated given the existence of too _much_ evidence of UFOs, _bogus_ evidence effortlessly invalided but casting aspersions on the rest?

.

7. Is there a mechanism employed to invalidate UFOs in the manner just described?

.

8. Is the planet Venus a viable candidate for the UFO/police helicopter (crew of three) incident over Birmingham in England last month?

.

9. Do radio controlled model airplanes fly circles around perplexed police helicopters as Nick Pope takes pains to walk the "safe path"... "worked up" even as his cautious interests are "justifiably" piqued?

.

10. Where is the multi-spectrum video of same suggested in use by Errol and Stuart?

.

11. Who is the "eagle-eye UFO sleuth" breaking the story out from staid official channels?

.

12. Is there a sea change to the approach and manner of world ufological reportage, in general, lately?

.

13. _Does_ a "professionally trained" observer remotely trump an untrained one? Will they _both_ make the same kind of "hysterical mistakes"?

.

14. Can it be possible to be "sick" of the plight of the "UFO Hacker," Gary McKinnon ? Is McKinnon a man who should be rewarded for revealing gross security lapses in government computers as regards a security infrastructure and apparatus _allegedly_ overhauled and hardened at the cost of billions in the wake of 9/11? Is McKinnon _persecuted_ instead by the threat of decades in prison on the whim of the entirely discredited Alberto Gonzalez and George W. Bush? Sick, is it remotely appropriate to _say_ so?

.

15. Has Great Britain deferred entirely to a "big brother" touting that they are "only here to help" with regard to that threat of terrorism?

.

16. What is Kevin Spacey doing now and how does it touch upon the subject of UFOs and ancillaries in a film presently being shot in New Mexico?

.

17. What are the quantifiable differences between skeptibunkies and consistent skeptics?

.

18. Did Phil Klass have any moral justification beyond back-shooting his opponents from their lettered positions or driving them to suicide?

.

19. How does Stuart Miller exactly mirror Dave Furlotte from earlier in the program?

.

20. Crashed Saucers in the UK further mirroring Dave Furlotte?Zounds, but only 30 minutes remain in this short program... Stuart Miller continues with discussion as regards what "sticks" about Nick Pope et al, then Chris Rutkowski regales with a report on his new book about gingham tea cozies... gotcha! ...Just seeing if you were paying attention. Seriously it's a cited book about UFOs as a _true_ global phenomenon!

.

Then, with as much "balance" as has yet been mastered, actually, Phil Klass was further "remembered."

.

Too, J. Allen Hynek slept here! ...Lots of intriguing and astonishing stuff to make you go hmmm, yea and verily. ...Stuff hard to discount when it is so soberly reported by a person with the stature of Mr. Rutkowski....

.

Ufological sensibilities remaining to be empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe or know the ubiquitous toad, fellow motes and travelers!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

~

alienview@roadrunner.com

http://www.alienview.net/AVG

Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

SDI #464 - Twenty Questions

20 Questions acerbically addressed by Errol Bruce-Knapp, Dave Furlotte, Alfred Lehmberg, and Michel Deschamps with a decided lack of elak if _exuberant_ élan:

1. Ears or rears or in arrears?

2. Suspicious facts are best? Outright fabrications are worst? Who makes which and why?

3. Fear, uncertainty, and doubt are "FUD" on ones face as is "mud" on a drying sheet?

4. Is it likely that a vetted person top-kick-accountable for the real-world intelligence of an outfit responsible for the use of the world's only atomic weapon... ...be not _also_ able to distinguish a ruined heap of common foil and balsa wood from a bona fide UFO?

5. Do three atoms of hydrogen and one of carbon have to smell this bad?

6. How long has gum been wrapped in aluminum foil?

7. At the end of a fact check, who's the idiot or the fraud?

8. What are the cognitive processes utilized in the determination of fecal matter from Shinola.

9. When are orders lawful enough for it to be acceptable to use the rational that you were "only following orders"?

10. Did Jesse Marcel Sr. concede to play the dunce on orders from superior officers?

11. Given there is admission by authority that an event of _some_ kind occurred at Roswell in 1947, what event actually occurred when all the explanations presented by authority are shown to be bupkis and nonsense?

12. What do 700 issues of FATE Magazine mean?

13. What is PalTalk and what will that mean to the future of Podcasting?

14. With no resolution but that leading to the highly strange, still... whatever happened to the flap at O'Hare from early this year?

15. Are UFOs on the verge of some ready-for-prime-time status in the discredited mainstream media?

16. What is the physical effect of seven pounds of high explosive arriving to impact at hypersonic speeds on _anything_ not prepared for it?

17. What must it be like to be sitting charged and ready in the cockpit of a state-of-the-art jet fighter knowing you were soon to hurtle down the active runway for scrambled take-off and shoot rockets at UFOs?

18. What value are documents "dribbled" and "redacted"?

19. What hazard is a well moneyed klasskurtxian machine?

20. Who is Lexi Loudin?


Gads and fracken zooks but that fifty plus startling minutes remain! Lexi Loudin, a regional science fair winner for her research into the "Flatwoods Monster," demonstrates "the child is father to the man" and that she has a "take on things," too. Michel Deschamps - Webmaster/creator of the NOUFORS - Northern Ontario UFO Research & Study site, fluffs the righteous anomaly discussing his search of newspapers for Northern Ontario UFO reports plus the famous Falconbridge Canadian Forces Radar Station case... then we hear whispers from the non acknowledged ufological past courtesy Wendy Connors.

Verily...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe now or know the toad with extreme prejudice!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

alienview@roadrunner.com
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

SDI #463 Twenty Questions

SDI #463 Twenty Questions

20 Questions concordantly addressed with wit, penetration, scholarship, and courage by Dave Furlotte, Stuart Miller, and Robert L. Hastings as Errol Bruce-Knapp struggles too arduously bringing it to us at all, and I ain't talkin' about no problems with no teefusses, aurally rendering EBK's usual Noel Coward into the Elephant Man —Ok, I exaggerated— still ...news at eleven:

1. "Blanchard, Lytle, And Roswell." What, who, where, how, when, and why?

2. Dead Generals don't lie about UFOs?

3. What _is_ a UFO legend?

4. How many "crashes" at Roswell?

5. How many "bodies" in the desert?

6. How many alien "survivors" at Corona?

7. Why did General Blanchard even issue the story that a "crashed saucer had been recovered by the Army at Roswell"?

8. How does an active duty Army flight surgeon holding the rank of full Colonel presently remember holding flying saucer pieces in his hand as a child?

9. How many times has "officialdom" issued a bald if _not_ bold lie regarding Roswell?

10. Are some ufologists point-taking adolescents?

11. What Roswell facts are _beyond_ dispute?

12. Is it one thing to profess blindness where one is actually blind but another when ones eyes are merely closed? Is it enough to squeeze a stifled four letter word out of Dave Furlotte?

13. Why is Art Bell touted by the mainstream as an authority on UFOs?

14. Does Stuart Miller hew the "middle ground" with regard to all things Fortean?

15. What does a scarce Paul Kimball have to say on the subject of "honest ExoPols"?

16. Why the strange manipulation of testimony by the Cardiff Police to assuage their odd complicity in the Cardiff UFO affair via a 999 (911) call?

17. What is this strange fascination with Chinese Wedding lanterns preferred to gassy pelicans?

18. What explains the deliberate sabotage of the UFO Hunter program vis a vis Cardiff, if a lantern _was_ the culprit?

19. Why are Condon and Brookings still not contested by the mainstream as a canted ax grind by the decision makers of the time?

20. What _can_ be said about societies millions or even billions of years in advance of our own?


...And sixty minutes remain in tumultuous cavalcade of Stuart's exploration of his perhaps nascent dark-side, that retreat of sensibilities in trepidation... to incredulous disbelief? Then Robert L. Hastings demonstrates how UFOs swoop down and turn our nuclear weapons on and off at will... that's right. Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe! Know the toad to squeegee that third eye!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

alienview@roadrunner.com
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

SDI #462 20 Questions

SDI #462

20 Questions addressed in a program of singular significance by Dave
Furlotte, Don Ledger, Michael Woods, and Alfred Lehmberg. Chilling
observations by Furlotte with regard to the alien abductions play out,
still, on UFO UpDates. Interesting observations are revealed by Don
Ledger
with regard to recent named conferences and the Stephenville kafuffle.
Michael Woods explores the solar system and puts us right there, then
offers
to step outside with anyone impugning Moonwalker Edgar Mitchell's
reputation:

1. If Alien Abductions are a result of mass hypnosis, who or what
performs
same?

2. Is humanity too advanced to be molested, or is humanity too
primitive to
be bothered with?

3. Should aliens show respect when it is so arguable that humans do
not?

4. If a superior intelligence would show respect, of needs, and a
"humanity" does not, what does that say of the intelligence of human
beings?

5. If a superior intelligence won't waste billions studying an
inferior
intelligence why do humans spend billions doing just that?

6. How is denial the only option available to the "spring-butt"
denialist?

7. Is humanity an abductor of inferior species?

8. Does the skeptic try to have the preceding argument both ways?

9. Was it a fluke that the Canadian Federal Government provided cash
to
conduct the recent Shag Harbor Conference?

10. Regarding the Shag Harbor conference, does a significant draw from

outside the community show that society is becoming more conscious of
UFOs?

11. When are we going to be able to see Mike McDonald's fine
documentary on
Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs)?

12. With the proposed museum at Shag Harbor, and St Albans, WV ...are
UFO
Museums beginning to pop up like toadstools?

13. How did the San Jose conference manage to keep the "woo-woo at low

hum"?

14. Why were there a lot of "academic types" showing up at the San
Jose
Conference?

15. At the aforementioned San Jose conference, what was the impact of
Belgian Major General Wilford DeBrauer and his investigation of the
famous
"Belgian Triangle"?

16. How is it significant to the UFO researcher that Military radar is

superior to Civil radar?

17. With regard to the stillborn "Condign Report," how is it the
report is
completed by one man who is not allowed to interview any pertinent
witnesses?

18. With regard to the "O'Hare Incident" how is Larry Lemke able to
demonstrate a genuine anomaly?

19. With 400 to 500 pilots busted for impinging on GWB's restricted
airspace over his reclaimed pig farm in Crawford Texas, who was finally

busted for impinging on same during the "Stephenville Affair"?

20. With regard to data storage capability, anymore, why would
officialdom
lose data that was going to come back later and bite them on the ass,
but
that is _was_ going to come back later and bite them on the ass?


Stars and sputniks, saints preserve, and suffering ZOT but that 45
minutes
remain of the neo-druid Michael Woods stewarding us around the moon,
neighboring planets, and the moons of distant planets sporting waveless

oceans of hydrocarbons smooth as the glass of black-based mirrors.
Breathtaking. Alfred Lehmberg behaves himself... to a degree.

Too, badmouth Edgar Mitchell as a "loopy old coot driven space crazy"
at
your peril. There's a whole covey of us over here at Virtually Strange

Network ready to stomp a new mud-hole in your flaccid ass, eh? Posted!

Know. The. Toad. The toad you know is the known toad knowing!
Trifle
_not_, the toad.

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

Written by Alfred Lehmberg --
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

SDI #461 - Twenty Questions

SDI #461 - Twenty Questions

20 Questions cogently addressed by SDI-nauts Dave Furlotte, Stuart
Miller,
Chris Rutkowski, and mission commander Errol Bruce-Knapp:

1. How does water on Mars, all but confirmed, only "sorta" make the
mainstream news?

2. Does Mars water bode well for "bushes" of all types, other
"vegetation,"
and even Martian "prairie-dogs" on the surface of Mars?

3. Have official photos of the Martian surface been heavily doctored
in the
past, and if so... why, really?

4. Does Mars have a _blue_ sky?

5. Is Astronaut Edgar Mitchell, with faultless reputation, of sound
scientific mind, a holder of an earned PhD from MIT, and the 9th person
to
walk in the moon... also a doddering old fool "obviously" in the throws
of
intellectual disintegration or cognitive infarct and grasping at a
"fame"
dwindling in twilight years?

6. As a rule of observed physicality: whatever "happens" undergoes a
"formality of occurrence" such that it is an unambiguous indication
that
what _can_ happen, happens? Happenings, having happened, of needs,
must be
continuing to happen? Submitted for the reader's approval: are we not
ourselves proof of the extraterrestrial because we are our own evidence
of
an intellectual happening and it is only the destructively obnoxious
arrogance which espouses it's _first_ or _last_ in _any_ chain of
being?

7. Have we in fact been "visited" according to those who might provide
a
"briefing" on such, are close to the subject matter at hand, and who
possess
that ephemeral "need to know" regarding same?

8. Is "disclosure" close at hand, even _if_ at hand at all?

9. Will humanity be overwhelmed or under-whelmed regarding disclosure?

10. Are some UFOs "home grown"?

11. Does the "ignorant bliss" we "enjoy" as a humanity with regard to
aliens provide some evidence as to their lack of "hostility" as
"hostility"
is presently understood?

12. What does an alien being _have_ to look like?

13. Who are the _other_ astronauts who correspond with Dr. Mitchell as
it
pertains to de facto aliens and intelligent life off this planet?

14. Is "knowing" as simple as "wanting" to know?

15. Is an embarrassed NASA damned if they _do_ refute Dr. Mitchell as
much
as they are damned if they _don't_?

16. Did Dave Letterman conclusively ridicule NASA in a recent "Top 10
List"
humiliation on national TV?

17. Is the end nigh?

18. Was "Y2K" a genuine catastrophe averted by early warning, or was
it a
paranoid nonsense provoking a waste of time and money?

19. Will the Hadron Accelerator create a black hole and implode the
planet?

20. Is our continued greater understanding of aggregate reality worth
the
risk of the preceding?


Great conterminous and _oblobious_ Zot, but I didn't even get through
_Furry_ this iteration before I hit 20! A record! Eighty minutes
remain of
Dave Furlotte: justifying, surprisingly, an unsettled dread. Stuart
Miller
explicates, perhaps, an inerrant glossiness about UFO magazine costs
and
production, UFOs in Great Britain Silly Seasons, and effusive Chinese
Lanterns. Stuart Miller also reflects upon a ufological individual
affect
vis a vis the "Mothman Futility Syndrome" even though he doesn't call
it
that and then further credits a totally unbiased and irrepressible Andy

Roberts regarding just one more ufological affair he's discredited
beyond
any _possible_ doubt.

Chris Rutkowski provides a good example for the word "asymptotic" as he

notes a more than significant upturn in the numbers of UFO reports
across
Canada over the last year in an official report. 30 more minutes
remain
from here, reader, minutes requiring no toad, actually... unless you're
due
a toad _booster_. If you're due, it's up to you.

Know the Toad! [All hail the Toad!]

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

Written by Alfred Lehmberg

alienview.net
AVG Blog
UFO Magazine

20 Quesions SDI #460

SDI #460

20 Questions _contrarily_ addressed by Dave Furlotte, David Cherniack,
Frank
Feschino, and Alfred Lehmberg as chopped, whipped, and blended by Errol

Bruce Knapp, facilitator for the the best ufological gruel on the
planet!
Sticks to your bones, it does.

1. What was the biggest and best documented yet almost totally unknown
UFO
flap in the history of the planet?

2. Who's seemingly been sneaking mondo-bionic klasskurtxian pills?
You
know what they say, go black don't go back?

3. What's _abundantly_ documented as crashed, crash-landed, or forced
down
not once, but ten times over West Virginia in one 20 hour period,
September
12, 1952?

4. Were American pilots ordered to shoot down UFOs in 1952? Were UFOs

subsequently shot down?

5. Given UFOs are not threats to National security, why would it then
be
necessary to shoot them down?

6. Given the mundane and unremarkable reasons proffered for the loss
of
hundreds of men and machines, why were both unceasingly expended still?

7. Given UFOs do not exist, what were our pilots ordered to shoot
down?

8. If it _was_ a war, who won?

9. Who is it with the _real_ naivety regarding many publishing
houses?

10. Why is Stanton Friedman so taken with Frank Feschino?

11. Wither Jerome and Richard and why should these be the first to
seriously examine Feschino's data, chips fall where they may?

12. What sells soap is sold as what soap sells?

13. What has happened to investigative journalism?

14. UFOs have a "secret history" pertaining to what "politics of
reality"?

15. Who is David Cherniack and how did he get interested in UFOs?

16. When is a basement not a basement but a studio?

17. Is Cherniack's documentary "perfect in every way"?

18. When is a "proof" definitive, or can it ever be "definitive"?

19. How have UFOs changed over the decades, or is it _we_ who has
changed?

20. Who has an agenda and what would those agendas be?


Great fecund zots and gravid horny toads! Over 60 minutes remain of an

astonishing Mr. Cherniack, an unsettling Frank Feschino, and the
usually
ebullient if properly whittled Alfred Lehmberg perceiving all _manner_
of
abject and obverted craziness!

Live free or die fellow babies and other pilgrims, too, mourn with me
the
horrible passing of Bill Nye the science guy, once a wonderful guy but
now a
fellow of CSI. He will be missed. If he'd only known the toad...
pity.

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
___

www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

SDI #459 20 Questions

20 Questions addressed with so much British reserve that stiff upper lips well nigh litter the ufological Debris Field! Contributing are Dave Furlotte, Stuart Miller, Dr. David Clarke, and Herb Schirmer… as tintambulated masterfully by Errol Bruce-Knapp with some gusto even if petulantly underappreciated by lack-witted persons notorious for using the word "maven."

1. Mary, Mary… quite contrary, but how does her garden grow?

2. Does the Jewel of mankind in creation's crown preclude the existence of all other jewels?

3. What is the "Ostrich Syndrome" and how does it lead to a dirty ufological nape?

4. How does the Pope "allow" the "right" to "believe" in UFOs?

5. Is the Virtually Strange Network a harbinger of the "End Of Days"?

6. Is a fundamentalist a fundamentalist and ever a fundamentalist? Scripture thumping deniers, klasskurtxians, and UFO "bleevers": cut from the same cloth?

7. How does one choose to accept, as real, a flying spaghetti monster they have never seen even as they deny the existence of that which can be reputably perceived?

8. What's a righteous wage for "keeping the grand UFO conspiracy alive" and what is owed the righteous conspirators?

9. What is it about the "End Of Days" that has Errol Bruce-Knapp checking his watch and tapping his foot with no small impatience?

10. Do the "aliens" at once supply humankind equal parts utter deniability and a stark permission to believe?

11. Asked before, but is the "word" not grease… but Grey?

12. MOD Files release: Unappreciated forthcoming-ness or more of the same old artful-dodgy ness?

13. Why does Stuart Miller not believe aliens are in contact with some Earth governments?

14. Would an alien contact a government of needs or ignore such as ultimately non-representative of individuals?

15. From where comes a "sympathy" for GB's Ministry Of Defense and other devils?

16. How are Americans accused of impacting negatively on the ufological?

17. What "official agencies" are involved heavily with UFOs even as they are denied by those same agencies?

18. What would a conclusive finding of bona fide extraterrestrial life on Mars via the latest robot probe mean… …really?

19. Did anyone else get tired of the unceasing dysfunctional space toilet stories every news cycle all over the world?

20. Are the Brits unfairly maligned for an "excessive" interest in bodily functions, both on and off planet?

Zounds, tut tut, and cheerio… but more than 60 minutes remain of discourse so reasoned, erudite, and reasonable it achieves a dryness profound enough to provide for its own abundant hydration! Obey your thirst? They're not really klasskurtxians, mind, but could play them on TV.

Too, news on the cancellation of the Roswell theme park is reported. SETI's ufological narrowness is iterated. NASA floundering? Where's George W. Bush when you need him. More!

Pictures of the "dark" side of the moon are suggested! And then? Doctor David Clarke! Listen to him verbally express a WEB site URL and know why people sing in English. Subsequently, he reveals the "truth."

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe, or it's sticky congress with the Hypno-Toad! All hail the Toad. Oh, hail yes.

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

alienview@roadrunner.com

www.AlienView.net

AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

Strange Days... Indeed #458 - excerpt

The Other Side of Truth: <em>Strange Days... Indeed</em> #458 - excerpt

SDI #458 Twenty Questions

20 Questions addressing the spirit of Deus Impeditio Esuritori Nullus
(No God Can Stop The Hungry) leavened, as it is, by the curse of
living in "interesting times." Dave Furlotte, Paul Kimball, Brittany
Babakioff, Greg Bishop, and Alfred Lehmberg cast conversational runes
on roiling decks as intrepid Captain Errol Bruce-Knapp deftly navigates the
dangerous straights of Ufologia on the razor's edge. The hyperbole circuit
breaker only got warm reader. No apologies here. That's the way it feels.

1. What makes living in our present times so damned "interesting"?
Is the "thing" interesting itself or is it interesting because our
interest is interesting? Do we generally conceive our interesting
times as a curse leveled upon us by angry gods, of needs?

2. Does the "new ease of communication" we enjoy as a function of
these interesting times qualify as curse or blessing? The Internet:
curse or blessing?

3. What is the "Big Lie," and how is it supported by the internet?
How is it combated by the internet? How does UFO UpDates provide
this "support" or perform this "combat"?

4. What are the "Big Lies" in 21st Century Ufology?

5. How do all "Big Lies" maintain their endurance given the huge
amount of proof and evidence obverting them?

6. Will a ufological "believer" buy into any hoax or fabrication
only because a personal worldview is supported?

7. Can something be too good to believe? Can something be too
horrible to believe?

8. What is a skeptic? What is skepticism? What defines "without a
doubt"? Whose doubt? When? Why?

9. How does UFO UpDates avoid or obviate corporal punishment on your
deceased equine?

10. How much money did "The Alien Autopsy Film" make and how was
that not money made as a result of a fraud? Jonathon Reed? The
Fox Network? Faked Moon Landings?

11. How reliable is Snopes.com in unmasking "Big Lies," Urban
Legends, and Ufological hoaxes?

12. Does "chain E-mail" satisfy a psychological need or purposefully
clog internet bandwidth?

13. The woods are full of kookoos, kookoos... kookoos? The woods
are full of Koo-koos... ...but my heart is full of love?

14. Is there little truth to the rumor that Paul Kimball has
forsaken his ancestral Canada for the United States decidedly Left
Coast?

15. When Paul Kimball leaves Canada for film forays south of the
border, is he seen off by angry mobs with torches and pitchforks
demanding he not return?

16. UFO Retro Con III was a "cool reminder" of United States
cultural history but serves what purpose for a ufological world
history?

17. What was the "Integratron," really? Who was George Van Tassel
and did he have a strong connection to George Adamski?

18. How is Paul Kimball a leader in the "modern contactee speaker
movement"?

19. What is a "Jacques Vallee kind of UFO case"?

20. Why is a "Tin Foil Hat Contest" contest hosted by RetroCon III
at once a delight and an outrage?

Zound's Zot! Seventy-three minutes remain of a charmingly ebullient
Paul Kimball waxing on UFO Retro Con III. Additionally, Brittany
Babakioff provides some hope for a continuing progressive
civilization plus a place for upcoming generations in the hoary, if
thankfully unhallowed, halls of ufology.

Greg Bishop shows a brave expanse of wide intellectual horizon to his
ufological observations and provides some demonstration how we are
the better for them, too. Mac Tonnies gets a mention as does come an
effusive praise for John Greenwald of blackvault.com! Yea and
verily, good reader, do we not preview what's in view for cogent
review? Ahead lies all manner of weirdness, reader, where we just
may discover that it was the "noise" that was the "signal," all
along?

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe or know the HypnoToad! All hail the Toad!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

Written by Alfred Lehmberg -
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

Twenty Questions -- SDI #457

Bereft of and apart from the puling hubris or errant arrogance
in other Podcasts, 20 Questions are addressed with soaring
imagination, earnest consistency, and satisfying alacrity by
Errol Bruce-Knapp, Don Ledger, Stanton Friedman, Dave Furlotte,
Richard Hoagland, Stuart Miller, Mike Wallace, and Donald
Keyhoe:


1. Is noted Physicist Stephen Hawking an unqualified Emperor
without any clothes?

2. Does Don Ledger know more about Hot Black Holes than Steven
Hawking knows about UFOs?

3. Why does any card-carrying Cartesian-ist feel duty bound to
pronounce so stridently upon that which they are largely
uninformed?

4. Does the card-carrying Cartesian-ist have the same
responsibility to "get it right" he demands from other
disciplines?

5. Just who needs to have a nice hot steaming cup of shut-the-
f__k-up?

6. Apart from perceiving same, is it possible that the SETI
crowd might be entirely incapable of even recognizing a bona
fide alien signal given equipment limitations, manpower/funding
limitations, and more appalling limitations regarding the
aggregate imagination or even competence of the persons
involved?

7. What does Humanity think it has that it is remotely in a
position to expect alien beings to account for themselves?

8. Does "assume" making an 'ASS' of 'U' and 'ME' occur often
enough for one to be guarded regarding any assumption?

9. Is Humanity smart enough and advanced enough to grok the
sense of an alien 'other' given the appalling record achieved
with disparate members of its own species on its own planet?

10. Is SETI set up to perceive smoke signals sent between
galactic civilizations?

11. Do the broadcast evidences of human civilization put aliens
on a war-footing with humanity?

12. Would a kind of quarantine be observed with regard to
humanity based on what we ourselves communicate to ourselves,
directly from and between our own lines regarding ourselves?

13. Is strawberry ice-cream and government cheese enough to
overcome the revulsion aliens may feel for humanity?

14. Are we right-thinking... thinking we would know what aliens
are thinking?

15. Does Real Canadian back-bacon from a red-headed Canadian
taste like pork, or chicken?

16. What do the trinket's and trash from alien beings
disembarking from a galactic Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria
consist of, exactly?

17. Who 'deals' with aliens and what's the 'deal'?

18. Who can you trust, and has humanity remotely earned the
benefit of a doubt for same?

19. Is there any doubt that UFOs are an aspect of intelligence
decidedly apart from lay humanity?

20. Does the Brookings Report reflect the sensibilities of
individuals, or the does it reflect the sensibilities of
cultures and governments -jealous of threatened catbird
seats- abusing those individuals? Wow. How could we have
missed _that?_



Zounds with carbon straps and JATO bottles! 67 minutes and a big
chunk'a change await the listener, so make sure the belts are
snug and review button's in easy reach! You'll want this stuff
to go deep if you wanna survive the concrescence!

Remaining is a similar fusillade of aural micro-mini mind
missiles... High explosive point detonations and deeply
penetrating delayed detonators that'll have ya goin' "Wow!" well
into the nether reaches... what'cha pay for eh? Moreover,
Stuart Miller reports what gives him the multi-levular heebie-
jeebies. Mike Wallace shows how much UFOs scare him personally,
though, the clear eyed and undaunted courage of Donald Keyhoe is
exemplified.



'Somethin's happenin' here; what it is ain't exactly clear...'

Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/


By Alfred Lehmberg

www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

Twenty Questions

SDI #456 -- Twenty Questions

20 Questions plucked from hoary history and in glad redux, addressed. "Things are now as they were then except..." along on the ride with Errol Bruce-Knapp, Dave Furlotte, Nancy Talbot, Bill Chalker and Alfred Lehmberg, "...YOU are there":

1. Et tu, Edith Jenson? Wither the dodgy provenance of a "filler piece" about any paranormal phenomenon? A clueless tool?

2. Can the appellation "buff" be anything other than a condescension and an insult?

3. Does the term "CropCircle" deserve "sneer quotes" in an article regarding "buffs"
of same?

4. What might Nancy Talbot's suggestion to Edith Jensen be if Ms. Jensen called Ms. Talbot a "CropCircle buff"?

5. Michael Pelani shows a genuinely sincere interest in Arizona CropCircles to be then ridiculed in the mainstream press for his sincerity?

6. Can the persons who hoax CropCircles remotely call themselves "artists"?

7. Are even the most complicated of the true CropCircles a result of a "natural" or unthinking phenomenon? Say, a result of the use of commercial fertilizer vis a vis a crop circle in a form related to a ...suggestion... of this type.

8. With regard to CropCircle investigators, does Dave Furlotte believe Nancy Talbot employs the proper methodology? Does she incorporate the rules of science assiduously? Does he believe she distances herself from any "personal passions" regarding CropCircles?

9. Is there any 'there' there with regard to CropCircles?

10. Does the CropCircle research demonstrate a definite ufological component.

11. Does Ms. Nancy Talbot see that the research into CropCircles gets into peer reviewed journals? What are the assessments of those peers?

12. Are some CropCircles plants bronzed, glazed, or chromed with metallic meteor dust?

13. Does one measured CropCircle factor, of many ...many... factors actually decrease the amount of the fallen meteor dust usually detected towards the center of the circle? Do the factors alluded to entirely rule out human involvement for some circles? Doesn't it take just one... and our pustule of ignorance is burst?

14. What heats meteor dust to a degree hot enough to liquefy it but doesn't burn the plants?

15. How can 10 micron iron spheres be taken for iron filings scattered by a debunker replete with getting a lettered scientist to admit he can't tell the difference, either? Science in shame again?

16. What is the history of CropCircles?

17. How much science is really done in CropCircle research?

18. Has an entirely new type of energy been intimated by the CropCircle?

19. Does the soil in a CropCircle grow a more robust plant subsequently?

20. Are CropCircles... letters under our door from conscious planet Earth?


Wow! 60 minutes remain of, quite simply, the finest UFO podcast on the planet, if I do say so myself. Nancy Talbot continues her startling UpDate of validity not discredited over the long haul! Bill Chalker remains to discuss the analysis of some rather salaciously acquired DNA peculiar enough to be apart from anything on this planet, reader! Music from the outback of Australia. Ironic rape. Fluid extraction. Big strong gals. Nipples bitten off! Not as weird as it sounds. No... weirder than it sounds.

Winding the show to its inexorable conclusion, Alfred Lehmberg achieves new levels of excessiveness with regard to the usual histrionics and ready exuberance! Repair to the toad or subscribe of your own accord all non-believers, otherwise be a "fluke in the universe" with the universe laughing at you behind your back!


...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/


Written by Alfred Lehmberg --

www.AlienView.net

AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

SDI #455 Twenty Questions

20 Questions heartily, intelligently, and courageously addressed
by soaring cleavers of direct incisiveness Dave Furlotte,
British publisher Stuart Miller, and as special guest, esteemed
Physical Trace Researcher Ted Phillips. Preparing, priming and
sealing these ufological mosaics, as always, is the almost
alluringly salacious Errol Bruce-Knapp:

1. Are secret meetings being held at the international level
regarding UFOs?

2. What is the purpose behind a supposed hoax regarding recent
secret UFO meetings at the UN?

3. Could Dr. Salla's "Exopolitical" interests in this UN affair
be a smoke screen of discredit for same or an honest effort to
generate interest in what many persons are convinced exists,
extant?

4. Given a political approach to ET is a rational approach based
on the idea of finding common ground with "other sovereign
peoples" (how ever these NPs would manifest themselves), it
remains that "politics" is an approach with which we have had
some experience. Should we be in any way surprised when, in as
much as it is politics after all, we seem to have such enmity
for the persons involved?

5. Is there a UFO "question"?

6. Did some kind of UN event actually happen recently of which
UFOs were a part?

7. What was the reaction of the UN to Gordon Cooper's 1985
address to that body regarding UFOs?

8. Why does the Air Force continue to investigate what they
report does not exist?

9. Have signatory sovereign nations admitted, as a result of an
agreement to relax secrecy in the UFOs regard, that UFO secrecy
existed at all?

10. Does an "official statement" with regard to UFOs loom?

11. How can one have an impact on society if that impact does
not exist? Oh, how can you be two places at once when you're not
anywhere, at all?

12. Who is who in the ufological panoply and who of these
detracts more than they add?

13. Why does the Canada Exopolitical contingent align themselves
with the likes of Sean David Morton?

14. Is the new AlienWorlds Magazine all things to all persons,
eminently readable, and an absolute delight as a magazine?

15. Is the so called "exopolitical crowd" naught but ufological
spoilers and ufologically toxic meme shills, and worthy only of
dismissal?

16. Are the exo-politicos making stuff up as they go along?

17. Are the exo-politicos dismissive of ufological history and
only interested in their own effect upon a present ufological
paradigm?

18. Are the exo-politicos too reflexively derisive of a
ufological old guard; ie Hall and Clark and Friedman et al?

19. How can news blackout and nondisclosure be the fault of
these aforementioned old timers -who have in no way discredited
themselves- that there has not been more interest in their years
of quality research and detailed reportage?

20. Is there no conspiracy in the cosmic sense? Given scientific
acceptance that there is a definite similarity across scale
(that its not a coincidence that tiny atoms resemble solar
systems in turn resembling whole galaxies...) that if there had
been a "Watergate" at all a "cosmic" Watergate seems reasonable,
and this is apart from all the knowledgeable worthies indicating
same for decades?


Bejeweled Zot, but that a full hour of fascinating program
remains! Ahead is Stuart Miller's continuing sagacity and some
startling new introductions. We're updated on community news as
it pertains to UFO edge-runners Tonnies and Bishop et al. Then,
J. Allen Hynek protégé Ted Phillips brings us up to date as
regards that thing most say would convince them as to the
reality of UFOs - Physical Evidence of same. Phillips has
documentation on 3800, plus, such cases. One
would think that would be enough, eh?

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe, or know the toad!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

Written by Alfred Lehmberg

20 Questions, by Alfred Lehmberg

20 Questions expansively addressed by Dave Furlotte, Mike Woods, Don
Ledger, and Alfred Lehmberg, served seasoned by our master Ufological
chef, Errol Bruce-Knapp:

1. What are the real mechanics of being sacked from a gainful
position over the subject of UFOs? Could Alfred Lehmberg and Angelia
Joiner perhaps provide similar reports? Did AJ get her two weeks
compensation?

2. Are effected folks pressured to "shut-up" by superiors and
authorities with regard to their reports on UFOs in and around
Stephenville, TX?

3. Does the Air Force know where its planes are?

4. Is the number of corroborating witnesses to the Flap well over
30? 300? 3000?

5. What are 10 F-16s _observed_ chasing if there's no such thing as
UFOs?

6. Does Stephenville, TX run a strange inverse parallel with
Roswell, NM? Why the "reflex lie" so obviously checked? Does
authority _want_ to get caught stupid?

7. How does one _chase_ what one _shall_ not investigate?

8. Is an informed populace able to give informed consent a necessary
thing?

9. How long _can_ confusion reign?

10. Is Stephenville an isolated location and singular in its
reportage? Are any outlying towns also affected?

11. Is there a Ufological tie-in with the reported reclaimed pig
farm bought at a steal that is the current ancestral home of GWB?

12. Is the dreaded "giggle factor" on the accelerating wane? Are
more people coming forward?

13. Is old CSICOP's new CSI taking hold? What's happened to Mr.
McGahoohee? Was Dr. Shermer re-drafted to cover a suddenly reluctant
or relieved McGeehoohar? Is it a shame given Mr. McGagaga was able
to Jenny-Craig all that extra poundage to look so _damn_ good on
broadcast TV?

14. Could it be possible at the alienating denouement that UFOs and
the supposed occupants of same... are minions of Satan, friends and
neighbors, demons to drag us into the fiery pits of hell by our
flaming shirttails, brothers and sisters... where we butt-surf like
yowling mongrels on a lake of fire for eternity? Can I get an
"Amen"?

15. Is there a lot of the preceding south of the Canadian border?

16. Do UFO flaps occur lately with an increasing frequency?

17. Do Ufological PODCASTERS "count"?

18. What is the "astounding information" rumored to be released by
MUFON regarding Stephenville?

19. If terminated Stephenville journalist Angelia Joiner is banished
from her employ after giving a professional two weeks notice,
herself, does she still get her two weeks compensation; is it her
employer with the lesser professionalism; was Joiner driven from her
employ to "wet-blanket" the story?

20. Who _really_ owns the paper terminating Joiner's employment? Is
it even an American?

In some realms it's called "facilitated gobsmacking." I've referred
to it frequently as "suffering baragrugous ZOT"; you may know it as
"Great GoogleyMoogley." It's with some small sorrow I report this
was the most substantive, expansive, and satisfying program yet...
grand words and true enough even if predictable. See, you almost
dread the report on such a great program because a good program next
time seems average and hard to write for to a degree... it's judged
unfairly.

Yeah yeah yeah... I hear the internal dialogue. Park it. I _said_
predictable! _Accuse_ same at the risk of a literary duel.

See, sporting an edge of uniquely layered design, and with real
carbon in the steel, too - a balance in the pommel... these programs
just go further and further informationally into the looming future
befor us. With verve and sack the program... well, it demonstrates a
certain courage given the future accelerates directly towards
aggregate perception so undeniably... roll that and smoke it, eh? A
certain foreshadowing is achieved with SDI!

Consider, the sustenance implied by the very first paragraph above is
not entirely inappropriate, eh? Errol serves up nutricious fare and,
Even if only a bland staple, these programs sustain like _highly_
seasoned. I suspect they aspire to be as revisitable as Terence
McKenna Lectures, if I may be bold. Hyperspace looms for all and
_one_.

But to the point, I only got 15:46 into 90:44 (reads like bible
verses, doesn't it?) of this exceptionally 'beefy' program! I didn't
even clear _Furry_, land o' Goshen brothers and sisters! He's always
good for 6 or 8 questions, but c'mon! All Twenty? Yes... all 20
questions righteously compelled in under 16 minutes right out of his
segment! A record!

An hour and substantive change remains and _such_ remains, reader!

...Remaining is newsman Michael J. Woods making a style of report
that I'm betting he's never made before. There is not an ounce of
tounge in cheek schadenfrude or professional distance. It's about a
new UFO documentary from David Cherniak that he is taking very, very
seriously. Shortly, he embraces the doc without reservation or
qualification. I don't think I overstate my case that the lovely
Errol Bruce-Knapp shares a similar sentiment. Reports and
predictions are that Paul Kimball's Best Evidence will be supplanted
as my _own_ favorite - and thank God for that as it's been such a
strain being nice to Paul... just kidding, Mr. Kimball!

Remains is aviating USO investigator Don Ledger, a man whom I wish
was selling a used car so I could purchase same, on the bee's knees
Stephenville report as it stands in the state of its art! From him
we get a very rational foreshadowing on this UFO kafuffle as it
pertains to the anticipated official report on same, and from which
information has been perhaps justifiably parchy! Mr. Ledger is
decidedly impassioned and informational vis a vis his concisely
detailed reportage on the Stephenville affair!

Then there's Alfred Lehmberg with his usual
reach-beyond-grasp-stream-of-consciousness-nonsense, but introducing
a tune he's composed called The Ballad Of Angelia Joiner, to honor
same. Don't let the expectation exceed the event, now. Sounds best
in WinAmp.

We're hoping John Velez can later add a percussion track...


...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe! Just do it: the Toad is _so_ last week.

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/


Written by the wonderful Alfred Lehmberg

SDI #453 -Twenty Questions

20 Questions assiduously addressed with no small perspicacious-ness by Dave Furlotte, Stuart Miller, Katharina Wilson, and Alfred Lehmberg while anchor Errol Bruce-Knapp provides for the usual masterful mix of meaningful sequencing and inspired orchestration:


1. Is the UFO UpDates Archive List, a searchable repository comprising tens of thousands of observations, discussions, and items of reportage as regards UFOs — an eighth wonder of the Ufological world?

2. Are Y O U a person of "obviously lesser intelligence" who feels there is a singular relevancy to UFOs?

3. Given the massive amount of data on the UFO UpDates server who is it remains so steadfast with regard to the maintenance of their abject and fulsome clueless-ness on the subject of UFOs?

4. Do the statistical figures quoted regularly by the ufological opposition even add up?

5. Like Siddhartha, does Dave Furlotte think and wait?

6. Will a reflex klasskurtxian of the James McGaha school return to the decades old canard of a ufology extant upon the misled, the misleading, and the mentally ill as the only explanation regarding UFOs?

7. Do UFOs, in some highly strange and interactive way, exist beyond question, doubt, suspicion, and reservation in the Cartesian world?

8. As to the problem Brad Sparks has with the efforts of Chris Rutkowski: could it be a moot point considering the ultimate message transmitted by effort aforementioned? Especially, as recorded so very assiduously over a period of years? Resolved: highly strange UFOs exist and interact on a discussible level with quality persons reporting them? If he's off... is he off enough to really matter? Don't the Greeks still get a lot of credit for getting the circumference of the Earth correct — less about 20% or so?

9. If Chris Rutkowski errs can it be said he likely errs on the cautious side? That even erring the wrong way he can be trusted to have committed as small an error as he could?

10. Whither the mystery of the "missing fourth wall"?

11. What dictates the performance of a "really good UFO magazine"?

12. What's the feeling in Errol's hoary old bones regarding the preceding?

13. Is a magazine that does not restrict itself to UFOs a really good UFO magazine?

14. With Dr. David Clarke contributing to Stuart Miller's fledgling "Alien Worlds" Magazine can Andy Roberts be far behind? Max Burns, what light from yonder window breaks?

15. What "career diplomat" is "obsessed" with UFOs and ET protocols?

16. Given the alien 'other' considered extant locally —on site at our planet— does beaming messages to aliens amount to the same kind of foolishness as trying to receive messages from aliens vis a vis SETI?

17. Asbestos covered UFO files of yesteryear are cleaned up and released finally, if not surprisingly, by the British MOD?

18. Are seagulls regularly mistaken for UFOs?

19. How expert are the "photo experts"?

20. Why are Fate & UFO magazines giving themselves away?


Great Caesar's Ghost but Stuart continues to dazzle, Ms. Wilson intrigues, and Lehmberg channels the usual leaping gnomes and machine elves from hyperspace with 52 minutes remaining...

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP9pIttPC68

Obey the Toad! Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program

Written by Alfred Lehmberg --

www.AlienView.net

AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

SDI #452 Twenty Questions

SDI #452 Twenty Questions

20 Questions regarding the omnipresent, including a kindling
representative of the mainstream, and more: addressed by the always
incisive Dave Furlotte, the pugnacious Michael J. Woods, a thoroughly
promising Billy Cox, and finally, award winning loose cannon Alfred
Lehmberg. Lashing this querulous team across the stark ufological
Iditarod is one Errol Bruce-Knapp - Mush!

1. Does British ufological nay-seer John Rimmer avoid his own gaze
in a mirror?

2. Does a saber slashing Dave Furlotte paint a detailed portrait so
decisively confuting to Rimmer’s sophistic soliloquy on a “Kenneth
Arnold” solution that it is sufficient enough to provoke a wholesale
rejection of Rimmer’s decidedly simplistic insouciance to same? LOL!

3. Were there more observers of the seminal Kenneth Arnold event
than just Kenneth Arnold?

4. Did 1947 Aircraft tails ever have atypical appearances or utter
absences?

5. Does the listener appreciate Errol’s use of bumper music
decidedly bereft of the woo-woo and illustrative of a point at the
same time?

6. What wipes the smirk off Woodsie’s face?

7. What’s up with the Drama involving Jose Escamilla and others
involving ownership, rights, and royalties of strange
structures/ships photographed in Earth orbit, recently, the pictures
taken as a result of some mysterious proprietary process?

8. Is John Lenard Walson the inventor of this proprietary process
allowing for regular telescopes to be used beyond their means?

9. Does Woods’ admonition to keep our eyes on this John Lenard
Walson thing provoke an observance to do so?

10. How large is “great honking huge enormous”? Have similar
monsters been observed before?

11. Why are big military Helicopters flying around the homes of
private citizens?

12. Does life become ever more apparent on the surface of Mars?

13. Is concern for the long running twin Mars Rovers misplaced given
they are five years into a 90 day warranty and _still_ making
Earth-shattering discoveries?

14. When will the first SDI All Nude Podcast be produced?

15. Why is Billy Cox all alone in Mainstream “Journalistia” to have
a studied appreciation for a real history involving UFOs, and how is
it that Mr. Cox doesn’t entirely know himself?

16. All the preceding considered, what accounts for a seriously
leaning new mainstream interest in UFOs and the apparent ramping up
of same?

17. What is the “cult of UFO” according to Parade magazine? Does
the pot call the kettle a “UFO buff”?

18. Does the mainstream itself believe that UFOs will not go away,
in fact make themselves more apparent in balance to how much they are
denied by a mainstream?

19. Is there any doubt that Dennis Kucinich may be the bravest
person running for President, ever?

20. Are links to Billy Cox’s blog (http://tinyurl.com/2tz57x) with
all deliberate speed by an attendant ufologia well advised?

Great barragrugousness and festivius ZOT but over 45 minutes remains!
More on a salient Dennis Kucinich, the surprising salience of
Shirley McClaine, and our specious social system’s paucity of that
_same_ salience.

All manner of sterling pearls are cast… without regard, reader, in
and around what’s been described here! It is left to the listener to
perceive real value in the form of efficaciously exploding cognitive
candy, micro-mini-mind-missiles of real novelty, capering hyperspace
elves facilitating an accelerating future. Step up!

…Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener’s own!
Subscribe!
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

Written by Alfred Lehmberg –
www.AlienView.net

AVG Blog — http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

U F O M a g a z i n e — www.ufomag.com

SDI #451 -- Twenty Questions

SDI #451 -- Twenty Questions

20 Questions calmly, competently, if disquietingly addressed by Dave
Furlotte, Stuart Miller, Richard Hall, and Leslie Kean as Captain
Errol Bruce-Knapp makes deft adjustments at the tiller of our ship.
All aboard.

1.  What _is_ the proper pronunciation of "McGaha"?

2.  How is it that it is left to Larry King to be the "appetizer" for
the ufological press conference much ballyhooed and recently
completed?

3.  Kudos to basso-ridiculum-in-extremis Major McGaha for exposing
the secret of Earthbound radars so powerful they are capable of
detecting planets in our solar system?  Have the more telegenic and
articulate klasskurtxians retired from the field in shame and
impotence?

4.  Invoking the name of his deity, does Dave Furlotte, at 5 minutes
and 25 seconds, express a depth of disgusted revulsion so effusive
and profound that small children should leave the room?

5.  Is Major McGaha, and the reflexively skeptical _cabal_ for which
he gleefully fronts, gutless, without sack, and otherwise sans
entrails on subjects upon which he (they) is (are) _ponderously_
ignorant?

6.  We all know that seeing is not believing... not anymore, but is
_touching_?

7.  Does SETI employ an astronomer who doesn't know when it's a full
moon, at all, but _especially_ on a night she filed a flight plan for
night operations in a small plane?

8.  Am I "misinterpreting"?

9.  Outside of Mr. McGaha, of course, _does_ anyone deny that there
are UFOs; that is to say: apparently physical unidentifiable objects,
seemingly intelligently controlled, flying before credible witnesses?

10.  Does James Fox -- the film producer of a quality documentary on
UFOs, favorably impress _everyone_ with whom he comes in contact?

11.  Why is it that there are _not_ web-casts of key events, press
conferences, and conventions, lectures... what have you, when this
writer could accomplish same with a cheap H2 field recorder, web cam,
and an internet laptop?

12.  How "good" were the participants of the aforementioned press
conference.

13.  Whither SERPO?  Has Mr. Doty shot his ufological wad?  Is it a
bad sign when nothing but air comes out?

14.  Has Mr. Doty a fearful countenance?  Is he a mini-god?  Has he a
demonstrated real military association?

15.  Has anyone ever heard of a CIA department called "ONE" -- an
MJ-12 knock-off?

16.  With regard to her appearance on Larry King, how did Shirley
McLain _not_ budge anyone's "fruit and nuts" meter significantly?

17.  What's to be found in the soon to be released "Clinton UFO
Papers"?

18.  Would most of us still prefer to 'know' given the risk of not
liking the answer?  Does bad news _ever_ get better with age?

19.  Is disclosure eminent according a new robot approaching Mars as
I write?

20.  SETI.  The crux?  Given the ufological evidence that 'they' are
'here' compared with SETIs lack of evidence that 'they' are 'there',
why bother?


Great suffering ZOT!  Over an hour remains!  Hear Stuart's defense of
Seth Shostak and SETI.  In the main ring of Errol's Flying Circus
Richard Hall and Leslie Kean remain.  Engage, heed the acceleration,
and feel the burn, fellow motes!


...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe!
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/


20 Questions by Alfred Lehmberg
www.AlienView.net

AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/