20 Questions heartily, intelligently, and courageously addressed
by soaring cleavers of direct incisiveness Dave Furlotte,
British publisher Stuart Miller, and as special guest, esteemed
Physical Trace Researcher Ted Phillips. Preparing, priming and
sealing these ufological mosaics, as always, is the almost
alluringly salacious Errol Bruce-Knapp:
1. Are secret meetings being held at the international level
regarding UFOs?
2. What is the purpose behind a supposed hoax regarding recent
secret UFO meetings at the UN?
3. Could Dr. Salla's "Exopolitical" interests in this UN affair
be a smoke screen of discredit for same or an honest effort to
generate interest in what many persons are convinced exists,
extant?
4. Given a political approach to ET is a rational approach based
on the idea of finding common ground with "other sovereign
peoples" (how ever these NPs would manifest themselves), it
remains that "politics" is an approach with which we have had
some experience. Should we be in any way surprised when, in as
much as it is politics after all, we seem to have such enmity
for the persons involved?
5. Is there a UFO "question"?
6. Did some kind of UN event actually happen recently of which
UFOs were a part?
7. What was the reaction of the UN to Gordon Cooper's 1985
address to that body regarding UFOs?
8. Why does the Air Force continue to investigate what they
report does not exist?
9. Have signatory sovereign nations admitted, as a result of an
agreement to relax secrecy in the UFOs regard, that UFO secrecy
existed at all?
10. Does an "official statement" with regard to UFOs loom?
11. How can one have an impact on society if that impact does
not exist? Oh, how can you be two places at once when you're not
anywhere, at all?
12. Who is who in the ufological panoply and who of these
detracts more than they add?
13. Why does the Canada Exopolitical contingent align themselves
with the likes of Sean David Morton?
14. Is the new AlienWorlds Magazine all things to all persons,
eminently readable, and an absolute delight as a magazine?
15. Is the so called "exopolitical crowd" naught but ufological
spoilers and ufologically toxic meme shills, and worthy only of
dismissal?
16. Are the exo-politicos making stuff up as they go along?
17. Are the exo-politicos dismissive of ufological history and
only interested in their own effect upon a present ufological
paradigm?
18. Are the exo-politicos too reflexively derisive of a
ufological old guard; ie Hall and Clark and Friedman et al?
19. How can news blackout and nondisclosure be the fault of
these aforementioned old timers -who have in no way discredited
themselves- that there has not been more interest in their years
of quality research and detailed reportage?
20. Is there no conspiracy in the cosmic sense? Given scientific
acceptance that there is a definite similarity across scale
(that its not a coincidence that tiny atoms resemble solar
systems in turn resembling whole galaxies...) that if there had
been a "Watergate" at all a "cosmic" Watergate seems reasonable,
and this is apart from all the knowledgeable worthies indicating
same for decades?
Bejeweled Zot, but that a full hour of fascinating program
remains! Ahead is Stuart Miller's continuing sagacity and some
startling new introductions. We're updated on community news as
it pertains to UFO edge-runners Tonnies and Bishop et al. Then,
J. Allen Hynek protégé Ted Phillips brings us up to date as
regards that thing most say would convince them as to the
reality of UFOs - Physical Evidence of same. Phillips has
documentation on 3800, plus, such cases. One
would think that would be enough, eh?
...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Subscribe, or know the toad!
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
Written by Alfred Lehmberg
No comments:
Post a Comment