20 Questions eerily addressed with some outraged, concerned, and
fearful sincerity by Dave Furlotte, Stuart Miller, and noted
Abduction researcher Dr. David Jacobs as related to Errol
Bruce-Knapp:
1. Whither Larry King and his periodic interest in UFOs? Is he
interested in forthcoming information from legitimate authorities or
to smudge the credibility of same?
2. Is default media skeptic Michael Shermer a legitimate skeptic?
What was Dr. Shermer's fascination with anal probing all about?
3. Why is Buzz Aldrin not called to account for his errant and
insulting ufological flippity-floppage?
4. What monstrousness motivates Miller's "mouthful of bile"? What
must constitute "much unpleasantness"? Who is it "whining and
moaning and complaining"?
5. Where is a rudely criticized Jerry Clark otherwise heartily
celebrated? Why is Dick Hall's largely taciturn 'chub' all bunchy?
Is the rudeness of the aforementioned remotely justified?
6. Are Dick and Jerry self-appointed authoritarian guards at the
gates of "Extraterrestrialdom" Ufology ?
7. Is revulsion with regard to Ed Gehrman's ufological
Alien-Autopsy-based Theory a justification for the aforementioned
rudeness?
8. Is science the only way that UFOs can be approached, and is
science only waiting for an excuse to provide for a mainstream
interest in same?
9. What has science concluded in a recently released 150 page
report on the very strange O'Hare incident?
10. What punches holes through several hundred feet of cloud and
lurks over one of the busiest airfields in the world?
11. When does a rowdy rugby club find occasion to play with Japanese
lanterns so others can later confuse these lanterns for UFOs?
12. When Stuart Miller and Alfred Lehmberg agree about something, is
it fact?
13. Upon being accused of trespass for using the Title 'UFO
Magazine' for his own purposes, is 'UFO Geek' Mike Coletta innocent
of wrongdoing and harassed by the "evil empire" of William and Nancy
Birnes; or is he a thief and a spoiler who should be charged with and
pay damages for his trespass on same?
14. How can an activity having almost nothing to do with UFOs
rationally call itself UFO Magazine?
15. Have over 1000 hypnotic regressions with regard to over 1100
abduction events corroborated the phenomenon as David Jacobs
describes it or confused an appreciation of same?
16. What conclusions has Dr. Jacobs come to? Has he changed his
mind about anything discovered in his decades long look at the
abduction phenomenon?
17. Do we have any idea what this conjectured alien abductor has
planned for humanity?
18. Is Jacobs' book, The Threat, a prescient book? Has it born
itself out?
19. When can abduction reality be determined as apart from
abduction fantasy? How are disparate persons able to tell the same
story with regard to an abduction event?
20. Do persons from different countries, having different cultural
mores, and speaking different languages express identical reports?
Do these stories subscribe to narrow patterns?
Zotted Zounds & Exspecto Patronus! 65 minutes remain! David Jacobs
continues to explicate his unrest and we are put paid our own as a
result! Excelsior! The ride continues, faster and faster, weirder
and weirder, but farther and farther!
Sincerely reader...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the
listener's own! Subscribe!
http://www.virtuallystrange
Thanks to Alfred Lehmberg for this post!
1 comment:
In #18? Born is borne. Sorry Mr. Hall.
Post a Comment